Everyone knows what each other earns - a new era in workplace culture

Experience shows that the real change will be in the attitudes of employees and in management practices. The introduction of pay parity is a process in which our workplace interactions, management attitudes and employee expectations will change significantly.

Tip of the iceberg: beyond the visible data

When wage parity is mentioned, most of us might think of mandatory pay bands or the principle of "equal pay for equal work". And while these are undoubtedly important milestones, they are only scratching the surface. The real, profound change will take place in the fabric of our workplace culture. It is worth reflecting on how deeply a climate of secrecy can undermine trust in an organisation. The introduction of pay parity could break through this very barrier. When employees see that pay is not the result of mysterious deals but is based on clear, transparent principles, it can significantly strengthen their trust in the company. And it's not just a "feel good" feeling, it's the cornerstone of effective collaboration, open communication and employee engagement. Moreover, the younger generations, Z and Y, have already been socialised around transparency. For them, openness about wages is not a "good would" but a basic expectation. If a company doesn't move in this direction, it can easily fall behind in the race for talent.

The introduction of pay parity also clearly highlights the growing societal demand for fairness. Today, promises are no longer enough; workers rightly expect to be rewarded fairly for their knowledge, experience and the energy they put into their work. And transparency narrows the very space in which wages can be determined by individual bargaining or hidden preferences, thus promoting a fairer compensation system that genuinely recognises performance.

Wages and performance

This change, of course, brings with it the paramount importance of performance appraisal systems. For how can pay be transparent and fair if the underlying performance assessment is not objective, consistent and clearly communicated? Pay transparency therefore also provides an incentive for companies to refine their assessment methods, ensuring that pay is truly a reflection of value delivered. This will also force a new kind of communication between managers and employees.

Managers need to be prepared to explain pay decisions clearly, allay any concerns and talk openly about their performance appraisal system. And employees should take responsibility for the information they receive and engage in constructive dialogue if they have questions or comments. This situation also requires new management competences: open communication, conflict management and fair decision-making skills become key. Leaders must lead by example in transparency and proactively address issues and sensitivities that arise. And this is a great opportunity for them to strengthen their relationship with their team and increase employee trust. And companies should support their managers in this development process, for example through training and organisational development programmes.

Vámosi Mariann

Potential challenges and solutions

Let's imagine a scenario: after the introduction of pay parity, it turns out that two colleagues working in the same job have significantly different salaries. The lower-paid colleague can then easily develop a sense of frustration and injustice, which not only reduces his or her motivation, but can also undermine group cohesion. And the higher-paid colleague, especially if he or she does not see the difference as justified, may feel uncomfortable. Dealing with such situations requires special attention as a manager. Tension should be resolved through individual discussions with both employees concerned. Listen to their points of view and explain the factors on which the pay is based. If the discrepancy is rooted in performance, review the performance appraisal process to ensure its objectivity and consistency. If the pay gap cannot be justified by objective factors, consider corrective action to restore fairness (e.g. a pay rise). Finally, mediation can help to establish a constructive dialogue between the parties.

The key to resolving similar situations lies in thorough preparation beforehand: a review of the pay structure, documenting objective reasons for pay differences (experience, qualifications, level of responsibility, performance) is essential. We need to emphasise the transparency of pay principles at the time of implementation and beyond, and ensure that the principles of pay parity are applied consistently throughout the organisation. Thorough and clear communication should precede the introduction. The objectives, the principles and the expected impact should be explained. Training should be given to employees on the essence of pay parity, fairness and constructive feedback, while at the same time providing employees with the opportunity to give open and safe feedback. And after implementation, the effects should be continuously monitored and, if necessary, the pay system and communication strategy should be reviewed. HR teams should be prepared to support managers and employees in dealing with issues and problems that arise.

Wage parity is not a threat but an opportunity. An opportunity to create a fairer, more transparent and trusting workplace culture. It is a cultural change that can result in a more engaged, motivated and productive workforce. Our job, as HR professionals and leaders, is not just to introduce pay parity, but to lead the change. Communicate openly, educate, support employees and build a culture where transparency is natural and accepted. It's not just a legal obligation to comply, it's an investment in the future, in the shared success of our company and our employees.

Mariann Vámosi

Founder and Senior Consultant of Projectis Consulting

Photo Pixabay

How to prepare for the implementation of the EU Wage Parity Directive? Practical tips.

- read our previous article on the subject!